Saturday, 20 December 2008

From Here To Eternity

Last month, L'Osservatore Romano -- known informally to the world-at-large as the Pope's newspaper -- published a feature write-up by one Khaled Fouad Allam, an Italian citizen by way of Algeria. His article, entitled "The religions and the fate of the world", sounded routine enough. However, run-of-the-mill it most certainly was not! For it was the first piece written by a Muslim to appear on the front page of the Vatican's unofficial digest. Whilst Allam's holistic aspirations may be highly suggestive of his underlying idealism, what he had to say in his column was pertinent; his message forward-looking; and his tone undeniably poetic. One can only hope that this quietly momentous event was a step in the right direction, both for L'Osservatore, and humanity in general. 

The news story, which explores the issue of the contemporary divide between Christianity and Islam, may inspire many a reader to wonder which is the greater hindrance to peaceably progressive communication: radical religious fanaticism, or a fundamentalist mentality that stubbornly refuses to accept the idea that it might, on occasion, better elucidate itself by stepping out of its own light, and into that of another? For this habitual reader of the Holy See's newspaper, the issues raised by Allam brought to mind the image of Dante encountering the poet Bertram dal Bornio (the infamous "lantern man"), in Hell -- illuminating himself with his own decapitated head. Yet, it also managed to take that disheartening image and counter it with one of eventual optimism.

In the article, Allam argues that we are living in an era of global crisis, a bedlam that he believes is the result of a "divorce between history and eternity." Granted, one cannot help but note that this rather cataclysmic worldview has been common throughout the history of mankind; but, there you have it. He goes on to say that, due to this crisis, the dialogue between Christianity and Islam should be approached from a more philosophical -- as opposed to a purely religious -- point of reference. An important observation, particularly when one considers the all too likely probability that interreligious communication between the two will continue to fail until such time as their differing cultural philosophies are properly addressed in their own right. Benedict XVI seems to support this notion, as well. He, too, has publicly expressed the urgency of initiating intercultural dialogue as a means of sustainable discourse between the different faiths. The success of this type of secular communication, according to Allam, would nevertheless require that Islam liberate itself from the strictures of tyranny and radicalism, whilst Christianity (and all of the West) must address the problem of its increasingly confused Janus face...which appears to be suffering from a dreadful case of tunnel vision on both its left- and right-hand sides. It would seem that we've quite the Herculean task before us!

However, Allam infers that it is not an impossible undertaking, as times of international crisis present humanity with the unique opportunity to approach a collective dialogue from a more universal perspective; that to do so "is in a certain way connected to 'salvation,' even in its profane version, which must illuminate the darkness of our time."

Whilst such a redemptive notion is evocative of many sentiments familiar to both Christians and Muslims alike, it is the lingering message of philosopher Emmanuel Lévinas that springs to mind as this particular commentator meditates upon Allam's words. In Humanisme de l'autre homme, Lévinas suggested that our humanity is found in the recognition that the suffering and mortality of others are the obligations and morality of the self. Wouldn't it be something if Christianity and Islam could come to terms with one another in this way; if, in this time of conflict and uncertainty, they could at last truly accept and embrace their similarities? Surely, if they could somehow find a way to see the one in the other, mightn't they ultimately come to appreciate their shared responsibility toward the destiny of mankind as a whole?

Ah, but how easy it is to get swept up in Allam's great (utopian) expectations!

Still, a successful dialogue between Islam and Christendom certainly has the potential to bring spiritual subjectivity vis-à-vis with a syncretizing sort of Cartesian consideration -- reformulated out of necessity from an ethical standpoint -- however unlikely such a situation may seem in the presence of our Western rationalism. If Khaled Fouad Allam can make the front page of L'Osservatore, then I daresay that one can harbor a little hope for the future of humanity.

__________

Allam's article may be read via the online archive of L'Osservatore Romano (in Italian only), or here (in English) via Sandro Magister's e-zine, Chiesa -- the feature is reprinted in its entirety beneath Magister's brief commentary.

2 comments:

Tara Isabella Burton said...

Thanks for the article, Alex; and thank you for letting me know about this excellent Chiesa blog! I've been reading the weekly L'Osservatore Romano in English, but often felt that I was missing out on a great deal, and while I can read in Italian, I do miss enough of the nuance that proper translation is always welcome.

Successful dialogue between the West and the Arab world is welcome on any grounds, whether secular or ecclesiastical. But the social significance of Allam's article must be huge!

I think what he has tapped into - and what's really revolutionary about this piece - is not just that yes, they should get along, but that there are real, tangible differences, not only doctrinally but also culturally: the difference between Christian "history" and Muslim "eternity," that need to be rigorously addressed. This is not some nebulous liberal Western group calling on Muslim women to remove their burqas, or some radical Muslim group calling upon America to stop airing Gossip Girl. This is about context, pure and simple, and a reasoned exploration of the very divisions - acknowledged, but neither swept under the rug nor played up to get votes or recruits - that resonates because of its intellectual honesty.

Incidentally, on the topic of similarities, I read on some blog that the now-infamous Rick Warren's "Purpose-Driven Life" contained a section on (Christian) submission to God that a reader understood as "the best explanation of Islam" he'd (she'd?) ever read. If only I could recall the link.

Anonymous said...

You're very welcome. I typically only read L'Osservatore in Italian, though. It's definately true that some of the finer points get lost when translated into other languages; but, that's why Chiesa is so great -- because Magister rarely misses anything, heh. [I also enjoy the Latinitas Foundation's journal...because it's all in Latin. You just don't see that enough, really. Heh. O, hail academania!]

The socio-cultural significance of Allam's article is definately monumental. He has a really interesting and syncretic perspective. To my great disgust, I've run into a few editorials both online and off in which he's condemned of sophistry; or else accused of playing/undermining both sides. It sickens me that [in said editorials] these people claimed to be supportive of Benedict XVI's statements about intercultual dialogue whilst slandering Allam [who, in my opinion, stated the case better than the Pope]! When, oh when, will progress escape the pyre? God forbid a Muslim should agree with a Catholic! For the most part, however, the general feeling around Rome/Vatican City is very positive, and very much in favor of Allam's ideas [as well as his ideals, which is just as important].

That's a very good point you've mentioned about the multi-layered difference between history and eternity. It's a highly consequential concept, I think. On so many levels. It seems to me that, sometimes, Christendom has tended to confuse Muslim "eternity" with a sort of desire to escape from the Western notion of "history" -- which, perhaps, is an accusation about trying to avoid accountability -- so it certainly comes down to context, indeed! It's easy to see how a misunderstanding like that could lead to the neverending circular argument that rages over the issue. That's why Allam and the Pope are, I believe, on the right track concerning a cultural/philosophical frame of reference from which to approach an open dialogue.